Note that over 1.1 trillion dollars has been spent on “homeland security” since 9/11. It’s a booming business, and represents the next market frontier for the military-industrial complex.
Note that over 1.1 trillion dollars has been spent on “homeland security” since 9/11. It’s a booming business, and represents the next market frontier for the military-industrial complex.
Through secret flights into the US, the terrorist group Mujahedin-e Khalq (also known as The People’s Muhjahedin of Iran) was trained at a US Department of Energy site in Nevada. The M.E.K. has been on the US terrorist watch list for over a decade now, and was implicated in the recent sabotage and bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities as well as the assassination of an Iranian physicist.
Despite the growing ties, and a much-intensified lobbying effort organized by its advocates, M.E.K. has remained on the State Department’s list of foreign terrorist organizations—which meant that secrecy was essential in the Nevada training. “We did train them here, and washed them through the Energy Department because the D.O.E. owns all this land in southern Nevada,” a former senior American intelligence official told me. “We were deploying them over long distances in the desert and mountains, and building their capacity in communications—coördinating commo is a big deal.” (A spokesman for J.S.O.C. said that “U.S. Special Operations Forces were neither aware of nor involved in the training of M.E.K. members.”)
Robert Hersh uncovered this story with his piece in The New Yorker.
So it comes to training terrorists to fight the war on terror. Ironic.
Democracy Now! has a great interview with Hersh:
For comparison, the U.S. in 2011 had an estimated GDP of 15 trillion. Any regulations the Obama admin was to implement over financial institutions are clearly toothless.
For over a decade now, news sources have been reporting on mass deaths in dolphin and whale communities. Since the effect was first discovered, it has been well linked to be naval and mining sonars, which plumb great depths with powerful sound discharges.
What does this mean? Since dolphins and whales normally navigate using echolocation, powerful interference from human sonar is enough to disorient them and cause them to behave erratically, making swift ascents and descents. When this happens, these mammals are likely to experience the bends (decompression sickness) as nitrogen normally dissolved in their blood forms bubbles due to a rapid pressure change. When these bubbles lodge in the body, they create joint pain, headaches, and sometimes a loss of consciousness or even death.
While sonar tech has been instrumental in the recovery of crude oil from undersea reservoirs, its power in recent years has grown enormously, and now resembles a threat similar to the military’s LRAD sonic weapon. One might imagine that an animal sensitive to sound waves would be in living hell when struck by high-powered sonar waves.
Due to a recent explosion of dolphin deaths in the Gulf Coast, some sonar activities have been halted:
With sick and dead dolphins turning up along Louisiana’s coast, federal regulators are curbing an oil and natural gas exploration company from doing seismic tests known to disturb marine mammals.
The U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has told Global Geophysical Services Inc. to not conduct deep-penetration seismic surveys off the Louisiana coast until May when the bottlenose dolphin calving season ends. The agency says the surveys are done with air-guns that can disrupt mother and calf bonding.
The company says it laid off about 30 workers because of the restriction, which it called unnecessary.
Environmental groups are suing BOEM over the use of underwater seismic equipment and say the restrictions should be extended to surveyors across the Gulf of Mexico.
This article sourced from CBS News.
The real causes are disputed, as the die off coincides with the recent BP oil spill, but humans remain the prime suspects.
Incidents have been reported over the past decade in Britain, through most recently in Cape Cod, which occurred only a month ago.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that strip searches may be conducted under any arrest circumstances, no matter how minor. The court asserted a concern over smuggled drugs or weapons, and stated that the Fourth Amendment provision against unreasonable searches and seizures did not apply to strip searches in the event of an arrest. The specific case involved the wrongful arrest of an Albert W. Florence over a purportedly unpaid fine (already paid), after which Florence was transferred between two jails and strip-searched at each one while he was held for over a week on false pretense.
The procedures endorsed by the majority are forbidden by statute in at least 10 states and are at odds with the policies of federal authorities. According to a supporting brief filed by the American Bar Association, international human rights treaties also ban the procedures.
Furthermore, Justice Stephen Breyer declared how this legal provision had already been abused:
According to opinions in the lower courts, people may be strip-searched after arrests for violating a leash law, driving without a license and failing to pay child support. Citing examples from briefs submitted to the Supreme Court, Justice Breyer wrote that people have been subjected to “the humiliation of a visual strip-search” after being arrested for driving with a noisy muffler, failing to use a turn signal and riding a bicycle without an audible bell.
A nun was strip-searched, he wrote, after an arrest for trespassing during an antiwar demonstration.
There is no doubt that strip search techniques has been and will be used by law enforcement as a method of coercion, and a way to intimidate and humiliate detainees. Read the New York Times article here.
As for Justice Anthony M. Kennedy‘s concern over drugs, we acknowledge that the drug war has long been a failure: More persons are incarcerated in the U.S. than were in Stalin’s Gulag Archipelago, and this rate of imprisonment has been caused by the “War on Drugs” that began in the early 1970’s. The U.S. currently has the largest, most expensive prison system in the world, which has created a massive lower caste in American society–one that is hindered from voting, getting a job, and achieving higher education.
Yesterday, the FDA rejected a petition by environmental groups to ban BPA (Bisphenol A) from food packaging. The organic compound is used as a hardening agent in plastics, though has been found to leach into the products it contains. This leaching is exacerbated in direct contact with sunlight, and has led many to switch from purchasing water in plastic bottles to purchasing glass and metal containers with less risk and a longer product lifespan.
BPA tends to break down under environmental wear, forming compounds that become processed as estrogen in living organisms.
Bloomberg Businessweek reports on the FDA ruling:
About 90 percent of Americans have traces of BPA in their bodies, mainly because it leaches out of bottles, canned food and other food containers.
Some scientists believe exposure to BPA can harm the reproductive and nervous systems, particularly in babies and small children, potentially leading to cancer and other diseases. They point to results from dozens of BPA studies in rodents and other animals.
But FDA reiterated in its response that that those findings cannot be applied to humans. The agency said the studies cited by NRDC were often too small to be conclusive. In other cases they involved researchers injecting BPA into animals, whereas humans ingest the chemical through their diet over longer periods of time. The agency also said that humans digest and eliminate BPA much more quickly than rats and other lab animals.
Avoiding plastics is difficult in a throw-away society, but there are a few alternatives for the determined and resourceful. And public standards are changing, as scientific findings are met with mandates for new social and environmental standards.
This decision by the FDA comes as no surprise, given its acknowledged history of corruption and collusion with chemical companies.
A landmark decision from the U.S. Supreme Court on monday, 3/26.
The Associated Press reports (via Yahoo!):
In 2010, a federal judge ruled that genes cannot be patented. U.S. District Judge Robert Sweet said he invalidated the patents because DNA’s existence in an isolated form does not alter the fundamental quality of DNA as it exists in the body nor the information it encodes.
But last year, a divided panel of the federal appeals court in Washington that handles patent cases reversed Sweet’s ruling. The appeals court said genes can be patented because the isolated DNA has a “markedly different chemical structure” from DNA within the body.
The Supreme Court threw out that decision, and sent the case back to the lower courts for rehearing. The high court said it sent the case back for rehearing because of its decision in another case last week saying that the laws of nature are unpatentable.
In that case, the court unanimously threw out patents on a Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., test that could help doctors set drug doses for autoimmune diseases like Crohn’s disease.
“The question before us is whether the claims do significantly more than simply describe these natural relations,” said Justice Stephen Breyer, who wrote the opinion in the Prometheus Laboratories case. “To put the matter more precisely, do the patent claims add enough to their statements of the correlations to allow the processes they describe to qualify as patent-eligible processes that apply natural law? We believe the answer to this question is no.”
The article goes on to mention that the U.S. Patent Office has been issuing patents on human genes for nearly three decades. Thirty years of pharmaceutical investment, which means a lot of drug company money will be spent defending these valuable patents.
We applaud the court, but realize that the battle is far from over, especially given that this decision concerns specifically human genes (not plant genes).